Said about az-Zubayr at a time for which it was appropriate
He asserts that he swore allegiance to me with his hand but did not
swear with his heart. (1) So he does admit allegiance.
As regards his claiming it otherwise than with his heart he should come
forward with a clear argument for it. Otherwise, he should return to wherefrom
he has gone out. (2)
(1). When after swearing allegiance on the hand of Amir al-mu'minin,
az-Zubayr ibn al-`Awwam broke the allegiance, then sometimes he put forth the
excuse that he was forced to swear allegiance and that forced allegiance is no
allegiance, and sometimes he said that allegiance was only for show. His heart
did not go in accord with it.
Though he himself admitted with his
tongue the duplicity of his outer appearance and inner self but this excuse is
like that of the one who reverts to apostasy after adopting Islam and to avoid
penalty may say that he had accepted Islam only by the tongue, not in the
heart.
Obviously, such an excuse cannot be
heard, nor can avoid punishment by this argument. If az-Zubayr suspected that
`Uthman was slain at Amir al-mu'minin's insistence, this suspicion should have
existed when he was taking oath for obedience and stretching his hand for
allegiance, not now that his expectations were getting frustrated and hopes had
started dawning from somewhere else.
(2). Amir al-mu'minin has rejected his claim in short form thus: that when he
admits that his hands had paid allegiance then until there is justification for
breaking of the allegiance he should stick to it. But if, according to him his
heart was not in accord with it he should produce other proof for it.
Since proof about the state of heart
cannot be adduced how he can bring such proof, and an assertion without proof
is unacceptable to his mind.
0 comments:
Post a Comment